Raj Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68758 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2022 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

RAJ KUMARI Daughter of Bhajju Sahni Resident of village - Karhuaghat, P.S.- Saharghat, District - Madhubani 2.

Anita Devi @ Manita Devi Wife of Sanjay Sahni Resident of village - Karhuaghat, P.S.- Saharghat, District - Madhubani 3.

Ajay @ Ajay Sahni Son of Bhajju Sahni Resident of village - Karhuaghat, P.S.- Saharghat, District - Madhubani 4.

Heera Devi Wife of Bhajju Sahni Resident of village - Karhuaghat, P.S.- Saharghat, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 337, 379, 448, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that they alongwith other co-accused persons abused the informant and when the informant objected, the petitioner no.1 assaulted him by means of dabiya due to which he sustained head injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68758 of 2022(2) dt.24-01-2023 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the petitioner no.1 assaulted the informant's daughter due to which she sustained grievous injuries.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the petitioner no.1 she is a female aged about 18 years, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No.07 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T