← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70180/2022allowed

Sohan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70180 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2019 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== SOHAN YADAV S/o Bisheshawar Yadav R/o Village- Chhaparadhi, P.S.- Khajauli, Distt- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Prosecution case relates to recovery of 620 litres of illicit liquor from different bags which were dropped by the accused persons, on seeing the police party. All the accused persons managed to escape except one, who disclosed the name of all accused persons including the name of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has no concern with the alleged recovery or with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70180 of 2022(2) dt.06-01-2023 2/2 place of occurrence. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed in this case by the apprehended co-accused before the police, which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. He is languishing in judicial custody since 20.09.2022. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Jai Nagar P.S. Case No. 181 of 2019.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U