Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69277 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Bineshwar Rawat Resident of Village - Belgha, P.S. - Warsaliganj, Dist. - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Cyber P.S.Case No.79 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111 and 61(2) of BNS Act, 2023.

3. As per the allegations made in the FIR, the coaccused persons along with the petitioner are involved in commission of cyber crime by using several mobile phones and SIM cards.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the alleged recovery has been made from the joint house of the petitioner, however, the petitioner has denied his involvement in the alleged offence and he has been roped in the present case only on the ground that he is own brother of co-accused Pintu Kumar. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69277 of 2025(5) dt.20-02-2026 2/2 further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged organized crime and he has been falsely implicated in the present case without any cogent evidence connecting him to the alleged offence.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, as well as, having perused the FIR and the case diary, it transpires that sufficient incriminating materials have been collected against the petitioner and the other accused persons. I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on pre-arrest bail.

7. However, if the petitioner so advised, he may surrender before the learned district court and seek regular bail.

8. The learned District Court is directed to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day and pass necessary order on the basis of materials available on the record in accordance with law.

9. With the above observation/direction, the present application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U T