Sanjay Basfor v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68389 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2019 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Sanjay Basfor, S/o Sohan Basfor, R/o Village- Machhagar Lakshi Ram, P.S.- Hathua, District- Gopalganj 2.
Sunil Basfor, S/o Sohan Basfor, R/o Village- Machhagar Lakshi Ram, P.S.- Hathua, District- Gopalganj 3.
Sandip Basfor, S/o Sohan Basfor, R/o Village- Machhagar Lakshi Ram, P.S.- Hathua, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hathua P. S. Case No. 15 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 302, 201, 364, 34 of IPC. As per F.I.R. the informant had gone to market for purchasing the household articles and handed over her son to her mother-in-law, when she returned from the market, her son was missing and it is also stated that she came to know that her son along with another boy of one Harilal Basphor were playing at the dear of Harbans Baitha. In spite of making best efforts, her son could not be traced. Petitioners are not named in the F.I.R.. Later on, their names transpires in the confessional statement of one Malti Devi.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68389 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that Malti Devi has already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 22.05.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 25231 of 2019. They are in custody for about 05 months and petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant, also, they have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gopalganj, in connection with Hathua P. S. Case No. 15 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned with condition that they have to co-operate in disposal of the trial and appear as and when required.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T