Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60865 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -625 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar Son of Latekaramchand Patel, Resident of Mohalla-Professor Colony, P.S. K.Hat, District-Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K.Hat P.S. Case No.625 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 379, 420, 427, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged by the informant that the petitioner took away the cancelled copy of Khatiyan from the District Record Room, Purnea and also abused the In-charge of District Record Room and threatened him of dire consequences. It has been further submitted that the petitioner has lodged a police case against the present informant being K.Hat P.S. Case No.620 of 2017 and in retaliation the informant lodged the present case with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60865 of 2017 (2) dt.20-12-2017 false and frivolous allegation. The petitioner having clean antecedent is in custody since 18.10.2017 and so he deserves bail. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the submission.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K.Hat P.S. Case No.625 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of allegation, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

Harish/- (Sanjay Kumar, J) U