Niranjan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63349 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3502 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== NIRANJAN KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Shambhu Singh Resident of Village - Chhoti Marai, Dhanauti, P.S. - Hajipur Industrial Area, District - Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Anuradha Devi Daughter of Amarnath Singh At Present Residing at Village - Balwa Koari, P.S. - Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar). ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Trial No.2835 of 2019 arising out of Complaint Case No.3502 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per the prosecution case petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and for demand of Rs.5 lac, it is alleged that the petitioner has stopped providing food to the complainant and started misbehaving with her and is spite of intervention of her family members, the petitioner is not ready to change his behaviour and also taken a note of her suicide on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63349 of 2019(4) dt.10-01-2020 2/2 the point of pistol from the complainant. It is also alleged that after snatching of the ornaments, she was ousted from the house on 26.8.2018.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact she was not misbehaving well with parents of the petitioner as such situation so arises and he is not ready to keep her.

In this case earlier a notice was issued to the O.P.no.2 and she has filed Vakalatnama also but no body appears on her behalf.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, if he prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T