← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1718/2017disposed

Sanjay Kumar v. The Central Bank Of India And ORS

2022-04-13Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah,Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1718 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9957 of 2016 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar son of Late Bisheshwar Prasad Sinha resident of E/7, Road No. 3, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Near Dadi Maa Sweets, Kalimandir Road, P.O. Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S. Agamkuan, Hanuman Nagar, District Patna. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The Central Bank Of India.

2.

The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Siwan, Near Head Post Office Siwan - 3.

The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India Gola Bazar Branch, Sonpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. S. K. Verma, with Mr. Jai Vardhan Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent Bank :

Ms. Nilanjan Chatterjee, Advocate ======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 13-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the Central Bank of India.

The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order dated 09.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 9957 of 2016 by the learned Single Judge.

The grievance of the appellant is that he is entitled for full pension as he had joined the service on the post of Clerk in the Central Bank of India.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1718 of 2017(6) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 appellant was discharged from the aforesaid job after serving the Bank for 10 years and more which qualifies him for pension scheme but the same was overlooked in the aforesaid order by dismissing the writ petition.

For the aforesaid grievance and any other grievance, the appellant may approach the respondent no. 2 with a fresh representation which shall be looked into and examined by the Bank and a decision shall be taken thereon at the earliest, in any case not later than six weeks.

In view thereof, the Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of as not pressed.

(Rajan Gupta, J) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Anjani/- U