← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17202/2024withdrawn

Ajay Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-21Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17202 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Ajay Sharma son of Late Shyam Sundar Mistri @ Late Shyam Sundar Sharma, Resident of Hotel Welcome Gali, D.B Road, P.S- Saharsa Sadar, District- Saharsa.

2.

Pappu Sharma, Son of Late Shyam Sundar Mistri @ Late Shyam Sundar Sharma, Resident of Hotel Welcome Gali, D.B Road, P.S- Saharsa Sadar, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Koshi Range, Saharsa.

3.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Saharsa. 4.

The Additional Collector, Saharsa.

5.

The District Sub Registrar, Saharsa.

6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Saharsa.

7.

The Circle Officer, Kahra, Saharsa.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned SC-6, Mr. Abbas Haider.

2. The learned counsel for the State at the outset submits that the grievance of the petitioners stand redressed. The land which was put on hold has been released by the Collector, Saharsa vide his memo no.3206-2 dated 20.11.2024.

3. It is further submitted that copy of the aforesaid memo has been handed over to the learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CWJC No.17202 of 2024(3) dt.21-11-2024 2/2 behalf of the petitioners in the Court.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that since grievance of the petitioners stand redressed as submitted by the learned Standing Counsel, hence seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.

5. Permission is accorded.

6. Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U