← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70391/2025disposed

Manjit Chaurasiya @ Manjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-07Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70391 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE UDAKISHUNGANJ DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== Manjit Chaurasiya @ Manjeet Kumar S/o Late Bhikan @ Narayan Cholaurasiya R/o Village- Karama, Ward No. 02, P.S.- Puraini, DistrictMadhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of four cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 55.720 litres of liquor from Ganauri Mandal.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from Ganauri Mandal with whom petitioner has no concern or relation but then he came to be implicated based on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70391 of 2025(3) dt.07-01-2026 2/3 confessional statement of Ganauri Mandal in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law. It is further submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise the police start implicating mechanically without holding a proper investigation of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise Case No. 516 of 2025 arising out of Uda-Kishunganj Excise P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70391 of 2025(3) dt.07-01-2026 3/3 antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner has antecedent of only four cases in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T