Manju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17928 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Manju Kumari D/o Sabhajit Singh, Wife of Sri Subodh Kumar, Resident of Village - Balia, P.O. and P.S. - Kurhani, District - Muzaffarpur, presently posted in P.S. Dhodhi Anandkar, Block - Kurhani, District - Muzaffarpur. 2.
Sanjay Kumar, Son of Sri Ram Pukar Chaudhary, Resident of Maripur, Chitraguptpuri, P.O. and P.S. - Mohammadpur Kazi, District- Muzaffarpur, presently posted in P.S. Chochaha, Block - Pokhraira Saraiya, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 3.
Raghvendra Yadav, Son of Sri Bhola Yadav, Resident of Goraul, P.O. and P.S. - Goraul, District - Vaishali, presently posted in U.M.S. Chadhua, Block - Kudhani, District - Muzaffarpur.
4.
Kumari Chanchala, Wife of Sri Keshav Kumar Singh, Resident of Village - Bedauliya, P.O. - Anirudh Belsar, P.S. and District - Vaishali, presently posted in U.M.S. Sujawalpur, Block - Pokhraira Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur.
5.
Krishna Nath Tiwari, Son of Ram Ugrah Tiwari, Resident of Village - Rampur Situwahi, P.O. - Karnaul, P.S. - Sahebganj, District - Muzaffarpur, presently posted in U.M.S. Situahi, Block - Sahebganj, District - Muzaffarpur.
6.
Pushpa Kumari, D/o Late Ram Aagar Singh, Resident of Nawal Kishore Nagar, Near DAV School, P.O.- Khabara, District - Muzaffarpur, presently posted in P.S. Siho SC, Block - Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur. 7.
Nirmala Sinha, Wife of Sri Ramji Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Bahilwara Khorampur, P.O. - Bahilwara Rupnath, P.S. and District - Muzaffarpur, presently posted in M.S. Gorigamadih, Block - Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur.
8.
Shyam Nandan Singh, Son of Julum Singh, Resident of Village - Senduari, P.O. - Senduari Govind, PS. and District - Vaishali, presently posted in U.M.S. Malah Toli, Block - Minapur, District - Muzaffarpur. 9.
Jaleshwar Prasad Sah, Son of Jaga Sah, Resident of Village - Mataiya, P.O.- Madhopur Ram, P.S. and District - Vaishali, presently posted in M.S. Kamathan, Block - Alauli, District - Khagaria. 10.
Rajbanshi Singh, Son of Sukhdeo Singh, Resident of Village - Panapur, P.O. - Pohiyar, P.S. - Jandaha, District - Vaishali, presently posted in M.S. Pitthauri, Block - Baniapur, District - Saran at Chapra. 11.
Anjani Kumar Jha, Son of Andrik Jha, Resident of Ward No. 03, Madhupur Ram, P.O. - Imadpur, P.S. - Sarai, District - Vaishali, presently posted in U.M.S. Bijaul, Block - Balrampur, District - Katihar. 12.
Shiv Shankar Prasad Singh @ Shiv Shankar Singh Son of Ram Sewak Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. - Arniyan, P.S. - Jandaha, District - Vaishali, presently posted in U.M.S. Husaina, Block- Barari, District - Katihar.
13.
Prabhash Chandra Sinha, Son of Late Nagina Prasad Sinha, Resident of Lane 103, Mukundpur Bhath, P.S. - Jandaha, District - Vaishali, presently posted in U.M.S. Bedanda, Block - Barari, District - Katihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17928 of 2022(3) dt.08-09-2023 2/2 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief, Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.
The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.
The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.
4.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur. 5.
The District Education Officer, Khagaria.
6.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Khagaria. 7.
The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra. 8.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran at Chapra. 9.
The District Education Officer, Katihar.
10.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Kameshwar Kumar ( GP- 17 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-09-2023 Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ application further development has taken place which has led to this application become infructuous.
As prayed, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U