Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73695/2025bail granted

Vijay Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73695 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2024 Thana- AURAI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vijay Sah S/O Radhey Sah @ Radhe shyam Sah R/O Village- Sarhanchiya, P.S.- Aurai, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Punam Shrivastava, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State Mr. Rabindra Kumar.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Aurai (Muzaffarpur) P. S. Case No.276 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 109, 124(1), 74, 332(b), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved before this court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.28750 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 06.08.2025 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 25.07.2025, as would manifest from Annexure-3 to the bail application.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73695 of 2025(3) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 petitioner and submits that in the event if privilege of bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner may abscond, on which, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Aurai (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No.276/2024.

6. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his mother, namely, Kusmi Devi, as it has been submitted that even the father of the petitioner has been implicated in the FIR.

7. It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T