Raghunandan Bhakt @ Raghunandan Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20017 of 2019 ====================================================== Raghunandan Bhakt @ Raghunandan Bhagat Son of late Indradeo Bhagat, Resident of Village Sikatiya Khas, P.O. and Anchal and Block-Panchdeori, P.S. Kateya, District- Gopalganj, At Present working as Prakhand Teacher Government Upgraded Middle School, Natwa, Under Panchdeori Prakhand, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar,Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar,Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra. 5.

The Zila Padadhikari, Gopalganj.

6.

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

7.

The District Programme Officer(Establishment), Gopalganj. 8.

The Member, District Teachers Niyojan Appellate Authority, Gopalganj. 9.

The Prakhand Pramukh, Panchdeori Prakhand, District- Gopalganj. 10.

The Prakhand Vikash Padachikari, Panchdeor, District- Gopalganj. 11.

The Block Education Officer, Panchdeori, District- Gopalganj. 12.

The Head Master, Government Upgraded Middle School, Natwa, Prakhand Panchdeori, District- Gopajganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Bhakta For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (Aag15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-05-2022 This case has been listed today under the heading "To Be Mentioned" at the instance of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the order dated 24.11.2021, there was direction to the Block Development Officer/ respondent no. 10 to

Patna High Court CWJC No.20017 of 2019(5) dt.09-05-2022 2/2 consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner. However, in place of Block Development Officer, inadvertently, Block Education Officer has been typed in the said order. Let the same be read as Block Development Officer/ respondent no. 10 instead of Block Education Officer. The order dated 24.11.2021 is modified to the extent indicated above.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) sunilkumar/- U