Mostt. Usha Barla v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3577 of 2017 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1618 of 2017 ====================================================== Mostt. Usha Barla w/o late Seikh Mehmood Alam, retired Principle, Government High School, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda, resident of A/7, Ashok Nagar, P.S.- Argora, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, at New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna, P. O. /P.S. Patna Bihar -800015.

3. Sri Rajiv Prasad Singh Ranjan, the Director of Secondary Education, Bihar Office of Director of Secondary Education At/P.O./P.S. Patna, DistrictPatna, Bihar.

4. Smt. Manjula Tiwari, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Office of Regional Deputy of Director of Education, Patna At/P.O., P.S.- Patna, District-Patna (Bihar).

5.

Sangeeta Devi, the District Education Officer, Nalanda, Office of District Education Office, Nalanda, At/P.O./P.S. Biharsharif, DistrictNalanda. 6.

Sri Dharmendra Kumar, the Accountant General, Bihar, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Birchand Patel Marg, R-Block, Patna (Bihar)

7. Anil Kumar Singh, the District Provident Fund Officer, AT/P.O./P.S. Biharsharif, District- Nalanda (Bihar) 8.

Sarita Kumari, the Principal Government High School, Ranabigha, Biharsharif, AT/P.O./P.S. Ranabigha, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda (Bihar) ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Mrs. Anima Loisa Topno, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 This application has been filed by the petitioner for

Patna High Court MJC No.3577 of 2017(4) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 restoration of MJC No. 1618 of 2017, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order passed by this Court dated 11.10.2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to unavoidable and compelling reasons, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter could not be rectified within the peremptory time granted by this court. She submitted that there was no deliberate or willful laches on the part of the petitioner. Having regard to the submission made above, the application is allowed.

MJC No. 1618 of 2017 is restored to its original file. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) kanchan/- U