Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62643/2019rejected

Bharat Bhushan @ Majhil @ Manjila v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-18Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62643 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2019 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== BHARAT BHUSHAN @ MAJHIL @ MANJILA Son of Gupteshwar Sah @ Madari Sah Resident of Village-Parasiya, P.S.-Brahmpur, District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashwini Kumar Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Brahmpur P.S. Case No.310 of 2019 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The informant got information that the petitioner and his father were unloading liquor and keeping the same in his house from a Victor Sumo Jeep. On search, a raid was conducted but the petitioner and his father along with others managed to flee away. On search, 26 bags each containing 96 pieces Crazy Romeo Whiskey was recovered from the vehicle bearing Registration No.WB 20V- 6971 parked in front of the house of the petitioner and 23 bags each containing 48 pieces Crazy Romeo Whiskey were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62643 of 2019(2) dt.18-10-2019 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not the owner of the house. The shop of the petitioner is situated at some distance from the place of seizure but it appears that petitioner and his father both were indulged in selling liquor and from the vehicle parked near the house of the petitioner, huge quantity of Indian made foreign liquor was recovered.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T