Pawan Singh @ Pawan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4686 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2022 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== PAWAN SINGH @ PAWAN KUMAR SINGH SON OF SHRI BINESH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AT HARPUR FARIDAN, P.O. DUMARI, P.S. - TARAIYAN IN THE DISTRICT OF SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Kundan Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'SC/ST Act') against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail vide order dated 22.11.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Saran at Chapra in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 356 of 2022 registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1) (r) (s) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
3. This is the second attempt of the appellant before
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4686 of 2023(3) dt.01-12-2023 2/2 this Court for grant of bail. From perusal of record, it appears that vide order dated 03.05.2023 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.395 of 2023, the appellant was granted bail with a direction to the learned Court below to verify the criminal antecedent of the appellant before accepting his bail bond and if the appellant has more than two criminal antecedents, his bail bond shall not be accepted.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant in para-5 of this memo of appeal has stated that due to inadvertence appellant has mentioned only two cases in para-3 of the earlier memo of appeal.
5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the materials available on record, I find that appellant has unsuccessfully tried to suppress about his one criminal antecedent and on this ground alone, this appeal is dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T