Baby Devi @ Indu Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51266 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2018 Thana -DANDARI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Baby Devi @ Indu Devi Wife of Ashok Poddar Resident of VillageNeema, P.S. Neema Chandpura, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Dandari P.S.Case No. 12 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation as per FIR is that minor daughter of informant was kidnapped by accused persons and later on statement of victim girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded and she has named one Prem Kumar Poddar, son of petitioner, who along with others kidnapped her. It is also alleged that the said Prem Kumar Poddar has made physical relationship with her. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is mother of Prem Kumar Poddar and there is no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51266 of 2018 (2) dt.12-09-2018 2/2 allegation against her and she has falsely been implicated in this case.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, named above, being a lady, in the event of her arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai, in connection with Dandari P.S.Case No. 12 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U