Patna High CourtCWJC/19394/2017disposal with observation

Birsa Uraon And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-31Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19394 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Birsa Uraon Son of Budhu Uraon Resident of Mohalla- Ram Bagh, P.S. Sadar, District- Purnia.

2. Manish Kumar Son of Krishnadeo Mehta Resident of Mohalla- Sant Nagar, Madhubani, P.S. K.Hat, District- Purnia.

3. Shashi Bhushan Singh Son of Krishana Dev Singh Resident of Vill- Paik par, P.S. Bhargama, District- Araria.

4. Amit Gautam Son of Nawal Kishore Resident of Village- Paik Par, P.S. Bhargama, District- Purnia.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary Urban Development Department , Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Purnia.

5. The Mayor, Nagar Nigam, Purnia.

6. The Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Purnia.

7. The Executive Officer, Nagar Nigam, Purnia .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shamshad Alam, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abbash Haider- SC6 For the Nagar Nigam : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 3933 of 2017 (Amit Kumar Rastogi & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19394 of 2017 dt.31-10-2018 2 /2 In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioners and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date1.11.2018 Transmission Date NA