← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3602/2017withdrawn

Nidhi Bhargava v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-12-17The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3602 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.759 of 2016 ====================================================== Nidhi Bhargava W/o Shri Lokesh Bhargava resident of Bishwambhar Sadan, Justice Raj Kishore Path, P.O. and P.S. Kadamkuan, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shri Rajeev Ranjan, The Director Secondary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

Shri Jyoti Kumar, The District Education Officer, Patna. 4.

Shri Sanjeev Chaurasiya, The Managing Director, Dayanand Balika Uchcha Vidyalaya Govt. aided Minori represented through its Secretary, Dayanand Balika Uchcha Vidyalaya, Mithapur, Patna.

5.

Shri Rajeev Ranjan, The Secretary, Dayanand Balika Uchcha Vidyalaya, Mithapur, Patna.

6.

Smt. Sharmila Kumari, The Principal, Dayanand Balika Uchcha Vidyalaya, Mithapur, Patna.

7.

Sri Yogendra Ram, The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - AAG- 15 Dr. Ratan Kumar, Advocate R-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-12-2019 The petitioner, through the instant petition has prayed for the following relief:

"For initiating a contempt court proceeding for willful and deliberate violation of judgment and order dated 04.09.2017 passed in LPA No. 759 of 2016."

Patna High Court MJC No.3602 of 2017(9) dt.17-12-2019 2/2 It is not in dispute that the direction contained in the order dated 04.09.2017 passed in LPA No. 759 of 2016 has been substantially complied with.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty to pursue such remedies, as are available with regard to the surviving grievances in accordance with law.

Permission granted.

With the liberty aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Spandey/Ravi/- U