Md. Mobin @ Mobin @ Matin Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51146 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -137 Year- 2018 Thana -JOKIHAT District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. MD. MOBIN @ MOBIN @ MATIN AHMAD S/o late Fajaloo @ Fajalur Rahman , R/o Vill.- Parkakan Ward No. 12 P.S.- Jokihat, DistrictAraria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 137 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 456, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of outraging the modesty of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is aged about 60 years and as a matter of fact the allegation of theft was lodged against the informant and for that a Panchayati was held in which, the informant was found guilty and she was directed to return the ornaments and due to that enmity, the present case has been lodged.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51146 of 2018 (2) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria, in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 137 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T