Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73783/2024bail rejected

Mansoor Ansari @ Mansur Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-25Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73783 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-669 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mansoor Ansari @ Mansur Ansari Son of Late Sahadat Ansari Resident of village-Bhela Chhapara, P.S.-Turkauliya, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjana Srivastava, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 25-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and Learned Counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No.168 of 2023, arising out of Turkauliya P.S. Case No.669 of 2021 lodged under Sections 341, 323, 302, 326/34 of the IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has earlier been rejected twice vide orders dated 16.02.2023 and 09.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.65339 of 2022 and Cr. Misc. No.82839 of 2023.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner's antecedent is clean and he is in custody since 26.08.2022. He further submits that vide order dated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73783 of 2024(3) dt.25-04-2025 2/2 09.02.2024, trial court has anticipated that within 7 months, trial shall be concluded. He further submits that report has been called for.

5. Learned Counsel for the Informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and seeks a short adjournment in this case.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and from the progress report, it transpires that out of 8 chargesheet witnesses, 6 witnesses have already been examined and trial court has requested that within 4 months, trial is likely to be concluded.

7. It transpires to this Court that the direct allegation is against the petitioner that he has stabbed knife on the stomach of the deceased, due to which his intestine came out.

8. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T