Vikram Jha @ Vikram Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63292 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2019 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== VIKRAM JHA @ VIKRAM KUMAR JHA Son of Sanjay Kumar Jha @ Sanjay Jha Resident of Village-Kasraur North, P.S-Ghanshayampur, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP For the Informant : Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for State as well as learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Ghanshayampur P.S. Case No.133 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 308, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case because no occurrence as alleged in the FIR has taken place. Learned counsel submits that the allegation leveled against the petitioner is wrong, false and concocted.

Learned APP for the State as well learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63292 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein the informant has identified this petitioner as one of the accused involved in the alleged occurrence in which informant was stopped while going on the motorcycle and he was also assaulted causing some injuries on his body, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer is, thus, refused.

In case, the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit and shall not be rejected only because this Court has refused to grant anticipatory bail to him. The Court below shall consider all the materials on record including the submission of the petitioner that the informant is a person who is said to be involved in falsely implicating several other persons by filing similar kind of case.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T