Panna Lal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15426 of 2023 ====================================================== Panna Lal Son of Borai, Resident Of Village Shahbarepur, P.S. Jafarabad, District - Jaunpur, U.P. And at Present working as Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, 1st Floor, Old Secretariat Building, Patna, Bihar.
2.
The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, 1st Floor, Old Secretariat Building, Patna, Bihar. 3.
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Joint Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, 1st Floor, Old Secretariat Building, Patna, Bihar. 5.
The Deputy Secretary to the Government, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, 1st Floor, Old Secretariat Building, Patna, Bihar.
6.
The Bihar Public Service Commission, 15, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Rd, Patna, Through its Chairman.
7.
The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, 15, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Rd, Patna.
8.
The Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeet Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Md. Nadim Seraj, GP-5 For the BPSC :
Mrs. Parul Prasad, Advocate Mr. Aditya Anand, Advocate Ms. Parinita, Advocate For the High Court :
Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 03-07-2025 The primary grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CWJC No.15426 of 2023(10) dt.03-07-2025 2/2 does not also press I.A. No. 2 of 2024.
3. As such this petition has become infructuous.
4. The petition stand dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. However, the petitioner shall have the right to pursue his remedies before an appropriate forum, if so desired.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Manoj/P.K.P.- U