Lallan Kharwar @ Lallan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21231 of 2019 ====================================================== Lallan Kharwar @ Lallan Prasad S/o Ram Tahal Kharwar, resident of villageSirsi, P.S.- Chainpur, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Registrar Co-operative Society, Bihar, Patna 4.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector Kaimur (Bhabua) 5.

The District Co-operative Officer, Kaimur (Bhabua) 6.

The Block Development Officer, Kaimur (Bhabua) 7.

The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Chainpur, Kaimur (Bhabua) 8.

The Secretary, Madurna PACS, Block- Chainpur, P.S - Chainpur DistrictKaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Sunil, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav, AAG 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY) 23-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner has raised a grievance that the names of 282 persons, who are residing of Gram Panchyat Madurna, Block-Chainpur, District-Kaimur to be included as member of PACS and also has claimed that the certain persons who are not residing in the village, their names

Patna High Court CWJC No.21231 of 2019(2) dt.23-10-2019 2/2 have been included in the voter list.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several representations have been filed before Respondent nos.2, 4 and 7 and also the petitioner has already made a complaint about the wrong preparation of voter list, but they have not done anything and sitting tight over the matter. Let the petitioner file a fresh representation before the Block Development Officer, Kaimur and he will be bound to hear the petitioner and dispose of the matter within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of the application. If the representation is not disposed of by the aforesaid period, the Court would take a very serious view in the matter. With the above observation and direction, this petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) (Partha Sarthy, J) Mahesh/- U