← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69353/2025allowed

Anuj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-25Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69353 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-692 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anuj Kumar Son of Premchand Ram Resident of Vill- Urdina, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Excise Case No. 692 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the various places at the house of this petitioner, from a cowshed and on the roof, a total of 105 liters of country-made and foreign liquor was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69353 of 2025(2) dt.25-09-2025 2/2 case. He also submits that from perusal of the prosecution report, it is clear that the recovery which has been made is from an open which is accessible to all. It has also been submitted that the petitioner has been framed by the police personnels. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise-II, Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Excise Case No. 692 of 2021.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T