← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67986/2025bail granted

Nisha Kumari @ Nisha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67986 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Nisha Kumari @ Nisha Devi W/o Kamlesh Kumar R/o Village- Kadirpur, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali 2.

Nibha Devi W/o Rajeev Kumar R/o Village- Panapur, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State .

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 89, 80, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 . 3 . As per prosecution case , daughter of informant was married with co-accused Nitish Kumar on 08.04.2025 and after the marriage , she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of additional demand of dowry and ultimately the accused persons committed the murder of daughter of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67986 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 petitioners are Nanad of the deceased. They are simple victim of over implications. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. It is further submitted that thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar PS Case No. 353 of 2025 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T