← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3988/2019disposed

Awadhesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-18Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3988 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14885 of 2019 ====================================================== Awadhesh Sharma S/o late Kedar Nath Singh Resident of Village-Bela Tarari, Naubatpur, P.S.-Naubatpur, District-Patna-801109 (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Kumar Ravi, Son of not known, District Magistrate, patna 2.

Kumar Ravi Son of not known District Magistrate, Patna 3.

Ansul Kumar Son of not known Sub Divisional Officer, Danapur, Patna 4.

Niraj Kumar Son of not known Block Supply Officer, Naubatpur, DistrictPatna 5.

Mohan Singh Son of not known Additional District Magistrate, Supply, Patna ... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Apurva Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate Mr.Arvind Ujjwal(SC 4) Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-05-2022 A Show cause has been filed on behalf of Mr. Anshul Kumar, the then Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur, Patna. In his show cause he has taken a stand that it was his first posting after completion of probation period and after going through the order of this Court he got a first impression in his mind that he had to consider the show cause of the petitioner and pass a fresh order at the earliest which he did within a reasonable time. He submits that the fact that this court had directed to restore the license and supply during the intervening period escaped his

Patna High Court MJC No.3988 of 2019(5) dt.18-05-2022 2/2 attention.

Although this court does not accept the ground taken by the then S.D.O. Danapur but finding that he is a young officer and it was his first posting as S.D.O. at Danapur, this Court is willing to take a lenient view of the matter giving him the benefit of doubt. This court would not proceed with the contempt application. It is dropped accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.