Patna High CourtCWJC/18985/2017disposed

Ajay Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18985 of 2017 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Sah, S/o Late Ram Bahadur Sah, Resident of Bakarganj, Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga, presently posted as Peon, Examination Department, Lalit Narayan Mithila Univerisity, Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 For L.N.M.U. : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the University.

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court as contained in Annexure-11. The University as well as State has not filed any counter affidavit.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court dated 19.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8532 of 2008, the writ application is disposed of with a direction

Patna High Court CWJC No.18985 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2018 2/2 to the University to examine the case of the petitioner and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court, as contained in Annexure-11, similar treatment should be given to this petitioner also. In the event the University finds that the case of the petitioner is distinguishable on facts and law, the University will pass reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U