Shankar Singh v. Bilash Singh And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.95 of 2018 ====================================================== Shankar Singh, son of late Bhagaru Singh, resident of village Rambhadra, P.O. and P.S. Hajipur, Distt. Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Bilash Singh
2. Prameshwar Singh
3. Fakira Singh sons of late Dip Naraya Singh
4. Pappu Das Chela Sita Ra Das, Ramchadra village Rambhadra, P.O. and P.S. Hajipur, Distt. Vaishali
5. Upendra Rai, son of late Subalal Rai
6. Dharmveer Singh
7. Sher Singh
8. Pinki Kumari All sons and daughter of late Rajan Singh
9. Mostt. Beby Kumari, wife of late Rajan Singh All resident of village Rambhadra, P.O. and P.S. Hajipur Nagar, Distt. Vaishali.
10. Laxmi Sah, son of Ram Chandra Sah, resident of village Hela Bazar, P.O. and P.S Hajipur Town, Distt. Vaishali
11. Haresh Patel, son of Ramdeo Patel, resident of Mohalla Nakhash, P.S. and P.O. Hajipur, Distt. Vaishali
12. Shankar Das, son of late Harnam Das
13. Shivjee Singh
14. Dewanti Devi
15. Patwa Devi
16. Malkha Devi
17. Bitai Devi All sons and daughters of late Bhageru Singh
18. Mostt. Lalpari Devi, wife of late Dukhit Singh
19. Suraj Kumar Singh
20. Andika Kumar Singh
21. Sanjay Kumar Singh
22. Meena Kumari All sons and daughter of late Dukhit Singh under the guardianship of Mostt. Lalpari Devi.
23. Dilip Singh, son of late Nanak Singh
24. Tota Singh, son of late Ram Dhani Singh All resident of village Rambhadra, P.O. and P.S. Hajipur, Distt. Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.95 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2021 2/2 ORAL ORDER 06-10-2021 No one appears for the petitioners.
From perusal of the record it appears that this matter has been listed upon motion made by the petitioner before the Civil Application and Motion Bench giving the reasons for listing that the matter has been settled between the parties outside the Court and the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ application. Accordingly, the case has been listed before this Bench for withdrawal.
Today, upon call, no one appears for the petitioners. In view of the fact that the case is listed for withdrawal, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U