Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68195 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Yadav Son of Kapleshwar Yadav R/o Village - Dharhara Kamat Tola(Ward no. 12), P.O. - Ganpatganj, P.S. - Raghopur, Dist. - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 130/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),109,74,303(2),351(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner assaulted the informant and his family members. Specific allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the son of the informant by means of farsa on his head.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68195 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and in self defence, the petitioner may have caused some injury on the person of the informant's son. Though the petitioner has criminal antecedents of three cases but the same have been lodged by the informant and his family members. Informant and father of the petitioner are own brother. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR, I find that specific allegation against the petitioner is that by means of Farsa, he assaulted on the head of the son of the informant, who was taken to the hospital on 08.04.2025 and was treated while final injury report was submitted on 26.05.2025, wherein the doctor has opined that the injury is simple in nature. FIR reveals that in course of treatment, son of the informant got fifteen stitches and there is only one injury caused by hard and blunt substance. Considering the admitted position that petitioner is inimical terms with the informant and for the said reason, already the informant has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68195 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 3/3 lodged three cases against him, as per the information contained in paragraph no.3 of the bail application and in paragraph no.10 thereof, information has been given that father of the petitioner and informant are own brother, the petitioner instead of getting their dispute resolved, indulged in crime, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T