← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19681/2019withdrawn

Chandra Prakash Narain Shahi, v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-07Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19681 of 2019 ====================================================== Chandra Prakash Narain Shahi, Son of Late Kapildeo Prasad Shahi, Resident of Race Course Chakkar South, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadepur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Finance, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department , Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Superintendent Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Kishanganj. 8.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Parasmani For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Ambastha ( SC-26 ) Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2019 A counter affidavit has been filed which is being taken on record.

2. This writ application has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to grant the petitioner promotion to the rank of Superintending Engineer. It is the petitioner's case that persons junior to him have been allowed promotion.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.19681 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 2/2 petitioner has submitted that after filing of the writ application, the petitioner's claim for promotion has been rejected by the respondents.

4. In such circumstance, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with a liberty to question the decision of the respondents, whereby his claim for promotion has been rejected.

5. This application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to question the correctness of the order rejecting his claim for promotion before appropriate forum including by way of filing a writ application. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U