Kaushal Kumar Jha v. The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20814 of 2019 Kaushal Kumar Jha, aged about 39 years, male, Son of Sri Binod Chandra Jha, Resident of Mohalla- Hanuman Nagar Colony, Station Road, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Madhubani Sadar, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
2.
The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
3.
The Controller of Examination, Lalit Naryan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
4.
The Deputy Controller of Examination, Lalit Naryan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
5.
The Dean of Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
6.
The Head of the Department of subject Education, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
... ... Respondents With Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20567 of 2019 1.
Sonu Kumar, Son of Suphal Kant Jha, Resident of Village-Dhankhori, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District-Madhubani, at present C/o Manorma Jha, At H. No. 803, Raj Kumarganj, P.S.-Town, District-Darbhanga. 2.
Manoj Kumar, Son of Mahesh Sharma, Resident of Village and P.S.- Nawkothi, District-Begusarai.
3.
Niraj Kumar Jha, Son of Nand Kishor Jha, Resident of Mohalla-Laxmi Sagar Near Gas Godam, Tesla Shiv Mandir, P.S.-Sadar, District-Darbhanga. 4.
Pramod Kumar Mahto, Son of Mahabir Mahto, Resident At R.K. College, Ward No. 11, Madhubani, P.S. Madhubani, Town, District-Madhubani. 5.
Vishwa Ranjan, son of Shri Bipin Kumar Das, Resident of Village-Ranti, P.S. Rajnagar, District-Madhubani.
6.
Sharavan Kumar Ram, Son of Ram Krishna Ram, Resident of VillageBakua, P.S. Bheja, District-Madhubani. 7.
Fulendra Kumar, Son of Sahdeo Baitha, R/o Village-Akaur Dighiya Toll, P.S. Benipatti, District-Madhubani.
8.
Kamlesh Kumar, Son of Vishwanath Kamat, Resident of Village-Arer
2/4 Siniwara, P.S. Arer, District-Madhubani.
9.
Braj Mohan Kumar Choupal, Son of Late Lakhan Choupal, Resident of Village-Gangwara, P.S. L.N.M.U. Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. 10.
Pawan Kumar, son of Krishna Prasad, R/o At-Kadirabad (Sarkari Bus Stand), P.S. L.N.M.U. Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. 11.
Jayanta Kumar Roy, Son of Late Debendra Nath Roy, Resident of VillageUjanpetta, P.S. Tamarhat, District-Dhubri 783332. 12.
Atowar Rahman, S/o Mofizuddin Ahmed, R/o Village-Madrassapara, P.S.- Mererchar, District-Bongaigaon, 783384.
13.
Arti Kumari, d/o Kaushal Prasad Singh, R/o Village-Hasanpur, Kaiju, P.S. Bangra, District-Samastipur.
14.
Saroj Kumar Yadav, S/o Ramchandra Yadav, R/o Village-Harishvara, P.S. Khajauli, P.O. Kanhauli, District-Madhubani.
15.
Idrish Ali, S/o Mokbul Hassain Sarkar, Resident of Village-Madhusdulmari, P.S. Gauripur, District-Dhubri-783331.
16.
Surendra Prasad, S/o Sri Ganesh Prasad, R/o Village and P.O.-Muradpur, P.S. Rosera, District-Samastipur.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, High Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Chancellor Bihar, Governor House, Patna.
4.
The Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
5.
The Pro Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
6.
The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
7.
The Controller of Examinations, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
8.
The Deputy Examination Controller-I.
... ... Respondents Appearance :
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20814 of 2019) For the Petitioners :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the University :
Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20567 of 2019) For the Petitioners :
Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadaw (GP23) Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP 23 For the University :
Ms. Binita Singh, Advocate
3/4 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2021 Since both the writ applications involve the same issue, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ applications is that after completion of the course, the petitioners have not been given opportunity to modify the synopsis within the time. Petitioners were not communicated the decision of Postgraduate Research Council (in short, 'PGRC' with regard to the modification of the synopsis. Later on, on enquiry it transpired that PGRC decided to modify the synopsis. Thereafter the petitioners submitted their proper applications for modification of the synopsis.
Learned counsel for the University submits that the matter would be examined by PGRC in the next meeting. In view of the stand taken by the University, both the writ applications stand disposed of. Postgraduate Research Council will take appropriate decision in accordance with the Regulation of the University as well as UGC for consideration of the case of the petitioners for modification of the synopsis at the earliest preferably within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
4/4 Accordingly, both the writ applications are disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U