Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68921 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2022 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Rai Son of Jibachha Ray @ Jiwachha Rai R/vDumharpatti, P.S.- Pupri, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apprehend his arrest in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 332 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'I.P.C.'). The allegation against this petitioner is to supply a bag containing certain materials to the wife of informant, where it is suspected that some unknown substance was supplied to her which was administered to petitioner through meal causing his illness.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68921 of 2022(2) dt.27-04-2023 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the maximum allegation against this petitioner, who is brother-in-law (Jija) of the wife of informant is to supply one bag containing certain unknown things. It is submitted that suspicion raised against in-laws family members and not against the family of petitioner, who is brother-in-law (Jija) of the wife. While concluding the argument it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as save and except suspicion as to supply bag, nothing appears incriminating on its face against this petitioner as per the narration of F.I.R., let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 332 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) pooja/- U T