Kapil Dev Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15720 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Kapil Dev Prasad Son of Late Sukhdev Prasad, Resident of VillageMotnaje, P.S. Nardiganj, District-Nawada. 2.

Sanjay Kumar, Son of Surendra Prasad, Resident of Village- Matnaje, P.S. Nardiganj, District- Nawada.

3.

Binda Yadav, Son of late Ramdhani Yadav, Resident of Village- Madhuban, P.S. Nardiganj, District- Nawada.

4.

Krishna Prasad Yadav, Son of late Gareeb Yadav, Resident of VillageMatnaje, P.S. Nardiganj, District- Nawada. 5.

Gopal Chaudhary, Son of late Somar Chaudhary, Resident of VillageMadhuban, P.S. Nardiganj, District- Nawada. 6.

Kamlesh Kumar, Son of Arjun Prasad, Resident of Village-Madhuban, P.S. Nardiganj, District- Nawada.

7.

Indal Prasad, Son of Rampravesh Prasad, Resident of Village- Matnaje, P.S. Nardiganj, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Addl. Chief Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Nawada.

5.

The Chief Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Superintending Engineer, Yojna and Monitoring Sell-3, Water Resources Department, Patna.

7.

The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Bihar Sharif. 8.

The District Land Acquisiton Officer, Nawada. 9.

The Circle Officer, Nardiganj, Nawada.

... ... Respondent/ ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mr. Priya Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

AC to AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AC to AAG-9.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15720 of 2024(3) dt.19-12-2024 2/2

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing vehemently for some time realizing his difficulty, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to move before the Collector, Nawada for redressal of his grievance as raised in the instant writ application.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U