Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Mohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2014 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR SINGH @ MOHIT KUMAR S/o Sri Ram Babu Singh R/o village and P.S.- Naya Gaon, District- Saran (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Najmul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ansar Ul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Naya Gaon P.S. Case No.146 of 2014/Trial No.1473 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 323, 353 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Saran at Chapra.

The accusation is that when the informant Kumari Sudha being the Incharge Headmistress of Raghuveer Singh High School, Mahadali Chak, was moving at the Varandah for checking of the school, at that time, the petitioner was moving in front of the class of the girls and was misbehaving with the girls. Thereafter, the informant asked the petitioner to go to his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66311 of 2019(2) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 classroom but the petitioner did not go in his classroom and attacked on the informant through fists and slaps, due to which she fell down on the verandah and sustained injury on her head. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that all the sections are bailable except sections 353 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code, which are not made out against the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of this case. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T