Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54789/2018bail granted

Manu Yadav @ Mannu Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-09-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54789 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2015 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Manu Yadav @ Mannu Yadav, s/o- Bachchu Yadav, r/o- village Gajraj Bigha, P.S.- Kako, in the district of Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Vijanti Devi, wife of Manu Yadav and daughter of Parshuram Yadav, presently resident of village Mahuabagh, P.S.- Kurtha in the district of Arwal. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Navin Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 31.5.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54789 of 2018(2) dt.04-09-2018 2/2 dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Arwal in connection with Complaint Case No. 108 of 2015.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T