Gautam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73038 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2025 Thana- Nehra District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Gautam Yadav S/O Sanjay Yadav R/O Vill.- Nainghat, P.S- Bhalpatti,DistDarbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nehra P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other accused persons have committed murder of informant's brother by shooting him on the head.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73038 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 2/2 also submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that specific allegation of firing is against co-accused, namely, Balram Yadav. The petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other coaccused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 15.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66970 of 2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nehra P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T