Vipul Kumar Patel @ Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.89 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -348 Year- 2015 Thana -GARAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Vipul Kumar Patel @ Vicky Kumar, S/o Late Anil Singh, R/o Village Laxmanpur, P.S.- Jandaha, Distt. Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2.

11-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 348/2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.

As per the First Information Report, four unknown criminals entered in the Piroi Branch of the Gramin Bank on 01.12.2015 and committed dacoity by confining the Bank officials and threatening them of dire consequence. This petitioner was nabbed later on by police on the basis of some confidential information received. When the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.89 of 2018 (2) dt.11-01-2018 petitioner was arrested and a search was conducted on his body a sum of Rs. 23,000/-, a railway ticket and a mobile phone were recovered. What is more important is that on the basis of his confessional statement a raid was conducted in his sasural from where a country made pistol with four live cartridges and Rs. 1,00,000/- in cash were recovered.

Further, it appears from paragraph 3 of the application that there are as many as six cases on the head of this petitioner and all those cases are of similar nature. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of this case.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T