Rakesh Gond v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63451 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2019 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Rakesh Gond aged about 21 years (Male), S/o Birbal Gond, R/o villageNadaon, P.S.- Buxar (Muffasil), District- Buxar. 2.

Govind Gond aged about 19 years (Male), S/o Birbal Gond, R/o villageNadaon, P.S.- Buxar (Muffasil), District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Buxar (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 119 of 2019 registered under section 341, 323, 324, 307, 452 and 302/34 of the I.P.C. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners along with other accused persons entered into the house of informant and assaulted with sharp weapon to the husband of the informant namely Mantosh Ram and bhainsur of the informant namely Santosh Ram.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63451 of 2019(23) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 case due to village politics. Learned counsel further submits that no specific allegation has been leveled against the petitioners and the allegation against them are general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel further submits that no source of identification has been disclosed by the informant and the informant has also not described the weapons which were used by the petitioners.

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the informant is eyewitness of the incident and all the four persons entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the husband and brother in law of the informant, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, if the trial is not completed within one year the petitioners may renew their prayer for regular bail. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Anjula/- U