← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74549/2024allowed

Bhola Singh @ Bhola Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-09Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74549 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Bhola Singh @ Bhola Yadav S/o Late Shiv Singh @ Late Shiv Yadav R/o vill - Prahladpur, P.s. - Chainpur, Distt. - Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, due to dispute with respect to the partition of land, 7 accused persons including this petitioner assaulted the informant. The allegation against this petitioner is that he assaulted on the head of Shyam Sunder Yadav by means of lathi causing head injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is agnate of the informant and due to land dispute between the parties, an altercation took place

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74549 of 2024(4) dt.09-04-2025 2/2 between them in which both parties have got injuries. There is case and counter case between the parties. It is further submitted that the medical report suggests that the injury is on the nasal part of the victim which does not support the allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Chainpur P. S. Case No. 245 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T