Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Gautam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69295 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2022 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR @ AMIT KUMAR GAUTAM S/o Umesh Ram R/vMirgapur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Baidya Nath Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 461, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution story in short is that some unknown thieves have stolen articles of Rs. 5,51,500/- from Har-Har Mahadev Jee Gala Bhandar and articles of Rs. 1,57,700/- from Ram Kumari Enterprises. They also stolen a Balero and a Van. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither alleged looted articles nor any incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. The allegations levelled against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69295 of 2022(2) dt.24-01-2023 2/2 petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that his name has been transpired in the present case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Ujawal Sahi. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the petitioner is also involved in this case, hence he does not deserve anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
Accordingly this application stands dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T