Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57899/2018bail granted

Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57899 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2018 Thana -SARAI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Golu Kumar Son of Ram Ishwar Sahani @ Jathu Sahani Resident of Village - Darhara, P.S. Sarai, Dist - Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. Smt. Kanchan Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2018 in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise (Prohibition) Amendment Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 253 liters liquor from the house of the petitioner.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is a joint house and petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Further submission is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 27.07.2018 and chargesheet has already been submitted. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57899 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 2nd cum-Special Judge, Hajipur at Vaishali, in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T