Jai Prakash Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63438 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2018 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== JAI PRAKASH BHAGAT S/o Sheoji Bhagat R/o village- Ukhai, Purab Patti, P.S.- Sarai O.P., District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.) P.S. Case No. 231 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation of having assaulted the informant on his head with daab, a sharp cutting instrument. The accusation is not corroborated by the injury report which discloses simple injury caused by hard blunt substance. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM VI, Siwan, in connection with Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.) P.S. Case No. 231 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63438 of 2019(2) dt.21-10-2019 2/2 ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T