Chhotu Singh @ Ankit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56565 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2018 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Chhotu Singh @ Ankit Singh, aged about 25 years, Son of Dinesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Shivdhara, P.S.- Mabbi O.P., District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sakri P.S. Case No. 84 of 2018 (CRI Case No. 1183 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of occupying the stolen Car along with other co-accused and after seeing the police party both tried to escape but on chase they were apprehended.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and has nothing to do with the Car. Similarly, situated co-accused person namely Dhiraj Kumar Jha, has been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 27.09.2018 passed in Criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56565 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 Miscellaneous No. 58782 of 2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 84 of 2018 (CRI Case No. 1183 of 2018), with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U