Panchu Yadav @ Pachu Yadav @ Bechhu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69649 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Panchu Yadav @ Pachu Yadav @ Bechhu Yadav S/o Rambali Yadav R/o village- Kumar Bigha Aliganj, P.S- Chakand, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025 Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 333, 127(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(1), 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.06.2025 at 09:00 AM, the informant was at his house and in the meantime, all the co-accused persons entered into the house with lathi, danda and deadly weapons and assaulted him with an intention to kill due to which he received head injury. It is further alleged that when his wife came to save, accused persons abused her and also assaulted her. They also tried to outrage her modesty.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69649 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus and from perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it is clear that the victim has received one injury measuring 1, 1⁄2 cm x 1⁄2 cm which is simple in nature. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.06.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-V, Gaya in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T