Upendra Sao v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59030 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -240 Year- 2018 Thana -BIKRAM District- PATNA ====================================================== Upendra Sao S/o late Ram Das Sao @ Late Ram Das So, R/o Vill.- Mahmadpur, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bikram P.S. Case No. 240/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he tried to outrage the modesty of informant.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner and informant are cousin brother and sister. There is land dispute.

Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 05.08.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59030 of 2018 (2) dt.09-10-2018 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 240/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T