Manish Kumar @ Michle v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75242 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2024 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Michle S/o Karu Yadav @ Karu Prasad R/o Brahma Asthan, P.S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Laheri P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Sections 307 and 504 have been added.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, when the brother of the informant was going to his coaching, at that time the petitioner along with five other co-accused persons assaulted and threatened to kill him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75242 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is a student of Graduation and also preparing for competitive examination. It is further submitted that injury report of the victim shows two injuries out of which one is grievous and the other is simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 29.06.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T