← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1799/2023consigned

Prabhu Sharan Das v. Bihar State Boarad Of Religious Trust,

2025-02-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1799 of 2023 ====================================================== Prabhu Sharan Das Chela of Late Brij Narayan Das, Resident of Village- Purnahiya, P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Bihar State Boarad of Religious Trust, Having its Office at Vidyapati Marg, P.S. Kotwali, Patna, District- Patna, through Superintendent. 2.

Sri Akhilesh Kumar Jain Adhyaksh, Bihar State Board of Religious Trust, Vidyapati Marg, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna 3.

District Magistrate, Sheohar.

4.

Sub-Divisional Officer, Sheohar.

5.

S.H.O. Police Station, Sheohar.

6.

Sanjay Kumar Sahni Son of Late Chhathu Sahni, Resident of Village- Purnahiya P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

7.

Mukesh Kumar Sahni Son of Naresh Sah, Resident of Village- Purnahiya P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

8.

Sohan Kumar Son of Bindeshwar Sahni, Resident of Village- Purnahiya P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

9.

Dharmendra Mandal Son of Late Ram Sewak Mandal, Resident of VillagePurnahiya, P.O.- Basantpatti P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar. 10.

Sri Vijay Ram Son of Late Bahadur Ram, Resident of Village- Purnahiya, P.O.- Basantpatti P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar. 11.

Shashi Bhushan Shah Son of Kishori Sah, Resident of Village- Purnahiya, P.O.- Basantpatti P.S. Purnahiya, District- Sheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sugandha Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy ( GP 18 ) For Board :

Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Adv.

Mr Saurabh Suman, Adv.

Mr. Ritika Shah, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2025 Heard the parties.

2. In this case, on 23.09.2024, two weeks' time was granted to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office.

3. As the same was not removed and the order being peremptory, it stood dismissed on 07.10.2024.

4. Perused the file and the same stands consigned. (Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U