Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57914/2018bail granted

Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57914 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2018 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/o Premnath Yadav, R/o Vill.- Mahapur, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 158 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act and sections 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 of the UAP Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of pamphlet and letter pad of Communist Party of India (Maowadi) and two mobile phones.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is student of B.A. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57914 of 2018(3) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM 1st, Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 158 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U