Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73257/2024bail granted

Nirmala Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-21Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73257 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Nirmala Devi W/o Bijali Paswan R/o Village-Mahua Singh Rai, P.S.- Mahua, Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Mahua P.S. Case No. 527 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the sister of the informant was done to death and disappeared her dead body by her husband and in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of money.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner is a lady. Learned counsel for the petitioner further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73257 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased and is also separate in mess and business from the husband of the deceased. It is also submitted that the husband of the deceased is in judicial custody. The petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 527 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T