Parshuram Mahto @ Gutur Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57691 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2017 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Parshuram Mahto @ Gutur Mahto, Son of Raju Mahto alias Ramesh Mahto, resident of Chintamani Chak, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 34.740 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from the Boat and petitioner fled away after seeing the police party. Petitioner claims that he was neither arrested on spot nor was anything recovered from his possession rather he has been implicated in the present case due to village politics. Petitioner claims that he is in custody since 02.08.2018.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57691 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 7733 of 2017 (Mokama P.S. Case No. 162 of 2017).

If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

That apart, in view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T